Personally, I think Gnosticism is wonderful, but silly to take it literally. It all post dates Judaism and most of it post dates Christianity too. The gnostics thought the demiurge was evil because YHWH is *written* as such an obnoxious character. Christianity, like Gnosticism, attempts to redeem the perfidy of Jewish scripture. In my opinion Jesus Christ comes to represent the true demiurge - everything that is just and benevolent. The blue light. I am not very familiar with the red light having seldom encountered it (when I did, it scared the shit out of me). But both must be representatives of the white light. The demiurge has two faces: loving, and mad.
Is the demiurge evil? One of the things I learned is that ultimately, for better or worse, we are all dependent on opaque authority for our existence. Like cattle, we may be given a decent life only to be consumed by our owners. Alternately, like locusts, we may be consuming a greater good than we could ever imagine. Or maybe we are prisoners here. But how can that be, when the cosmos is so full and beautiful? Descartes’ demon springs from the shadows. And all we can affirm is “cogito ergo sum”.
Aliens are just Gnostic archons in the flesh. And sometimes it does truly seem we are being manipulated by aliens. But where does the power of our rulers come from? Without the bibles, they would be powerless. This tells me that our rulers are merely human, and the Demiurge is our greatest ally.
Paul, a proto Gnostic who invented Christianity, implies Christ was executed by archons somewhere in the third heaven. The gospels turned these archons into Romans.
The Mystery Star is the liminal luminary beyond which the spiritual reality begins. You can discover it when your intelligence leaves behind your physical form.
Gnosticism greatly predates any abrahamic institution, its roots are Egyptian, as is the expression of Jesus.
I do not find any Gnosis in the modern explanations, often highly intellectual, of Gnosticism, including the very fashionable Tech-Gnosticism. I offer some of these modern discussions here as a service to the reader, not as a hard and fast definition of truth.
There is no complete definition, in this world of things, that is assignable and complete to the spiritual reality. Efforts to do such will always be incomplete, resulting in deeply flawed and insane judgements, such as those made by the abrahamics today.
Iasous is in Coptic right? Coptic only dates to 3rd century BCE. When are your Coptic references to Iasous dated? Is there any Iasous before that? In hieroglyphs? I don’t think so… Paul invented Christianity and he named Jesus after Joshua in the Greek Septuagint, which also dates to 3rd century BCE. Just because Gnosticism’s “roots” are more ancient doesn’t make it more ancient. Jesus/Joshua is ultimately named after Judah or YHWH. It’s nearest relative is Greek Jason.
If you want to fight, L. we can fight. If you actually read what I wrote you would understand Iao as ancient, and beyond the final manifestation of ancient Egyptian, which happens to be Coptic.
There is a strong spiritual reason for the conclusion I provide as well, and it goes back to the root of Egyptian spirituality. It has to do with the actual praxis.
I made it clear this is an introduction, not a book. In case that wasn't clear, it should be clear now.
Certainly the intention of any act has little to do with how that act makes its mark on the world, and when it comes to this weaponization of deep forces, we are left with a circumstance, a situation of harm done.
This presents us all with a series of choices, beginning with the essential one; Recognition. Will the recognition of the act, and its results be allowed to occur?
I think this is a real question, and the inquiry it sparks has every possibility of completely destroying the models of illness, health, and reality that have been constructed into for profit industries.
Therefore, any willingness to face this question, and the ones that naturally follow require great courage, and an allegiance to truth.
This in itself is daunting for modern man. We will see if mankind has what it takes to end the harm, and face this challenge.
Well said.
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
There must be alot of good indending people out there....
What is the Mystery Star?
Personally, I think Gnosticism is wonderful, but silly to take it literally. It all post dates Judaism and most of it post dates Christianity too. The gnostics thought the demiurge was evil because YHWH is *written* as such an obnoxious character. Christianity, like Gnosticism, attempts to redeem the perfidy of Jewish scripture. In my opinion Jesus Christ comes to represent the true demiurge - everything that is just and benevolent. The blue light. I am not very familiar with the red light having seldom encountered it (when I did, it scared the shit out of me). But both must be representatives of the white light. The demiurge has two faces: loving, and mad.
Is the demiurge evil? One of the things I learned is that ultimately, for better or worse, we are all dependent on opaque authority for our existence. Like cattle, we may be given a decent life only to be consumed by our owners. Alternately, like locusts, we may be consuming a greater good than we could ever imagine. Or maybe we are prisoners here. But how can that be, when the cosmos is so full and beautiful? Descartes’ demon springs from the shadows. And all we can affirm is “cogito ergo sum”.
Aliens are just Gnostic archons in the flesh. And sometimes it does truly seem we are being manipulated by aliens. But where does the power of our rulers come from? Without the bibles, they would be powerless. This tells me that our rulers are merely human, and the Demiurge is our greatest ally.
Paul, a proto Gnostic who invented Christianity, implies Christ was executed by archons somewhere in the third heaven. The gospels turned these archons into Romans.
The Mystery Star is the liminal luminary beyond which the spiritual reality begins. You can discover it when your intelligence leaves behind your physical form.
Gnosticism greatly predates any abrahamic institution, its roots are Egyptian, as is the expression of Jesus.
I do not find any Gnosis in the modern explanations, often highly intellectual, of Gnosticism, including the very fashionable Tech-Gnosticism. I offer some of these modern discussions here as a service to the reader, not as a hard and fast definition of truth.
There is no complete definition, in this world of things, that is assignable and complete to the spiritual reality. Efforts to do such will always be incomplete, resulting in deeply flawed and insane judgements, such as those made by the abrahamics today.
Thanks for reading.
Iasous is in Coptic right? Coptic only dates to 3rd century BCE. When are your Coptic references to Iasous dated? Is there any Iasous before that? In hieroglyphs? I don’t think so… Paul invented Christianity and he named Jesus after Joshua in the Greek Septuagint, which also dates to 3rd century BCE. Just because Gnosticism’s “roots” are more ancient doesn’t make it more ancient. Jesus/Joshua is ultimately named after Judah or YHWH. It’s nearest relative is Greek Jason.
If you want to fight, L. we can fight. If you actually read what I wrote you would understand Iao as ancient, and beyond the final manifestation of ancient Egyptian, which happens to be Coptic.
There is a strong spiritual reason for the conclusion I provide as well, and it goes back to the root of Egyptian spirituality. It has to do with the actual praxis.
I made it clear this is an introduction, not a book. In case that wasn't clear, it should be clear now.
Well I do like to fight, it’s a good way to learn.
Certainly the intention of any act has little to do with how that act makes its mark on the world, and when it comes to this weaponization of deep forces, we are left with a circumstance, a situation of harm done.
This presents us all with a series of choices, beginning with the essential one; Recognition. Will the recognition of the act, and its results be allowed to occur?
I think this is a real question, and the inquiry it sparks has every possibility of completely destroying the models of illness, health, and reality that have been constructed into for profit industries.
Therefore, any willingness to face this question, and the ones that naturally follow require great courage, and an allegiance to truth.
This in itself is daunting for modern man. We will see if mankind has what it takes to end the harm, and face this challenge.